SCRUB: Starship SN15 Test Flight Scrubbed

13 288 Views 1.3M
Science & Technology

SpaceX is performing a test flight of Starship SN15. The prototype will aim to be the first Starship vehicle to softly land during a high altitude flight test. Like the previous Starship prototypes, SN15 is expected to fly to approximately 10 kilometers.
Updates: forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=52398.0
Articles: www.nasaspaceflight.com/tag/starship/
Shop: www.nasaspaceflight.com/shop/

Comments

  1. Alan blyde
    Alan blyde
    3 days ago

    All good 🇳🇿👍

  2. sokin jon
    sokin jon
    9 days ago

    Dagummit y'all are on trending!!

  3. doire aintu
    doire aintu
    11 days ago

    3:20:52

  4. aola wili
    aola wili
    13 days ago

    🌮

  5. yuoop noke
    yuoop noke
    13 days ago

    🌮

  6. El Nino
    El Nino
    14 days ago

    This just popped up may 4th thought it meant today's flight damn you UKwill for giving me heart attack

    1. sokin jon
      sokin jon
      9 days ago

      I could do without the toxic poop commercials. What a farce. Yes, poop is a fact of life. But, this SpaceX stuff is cool.

  7. طه حسين
    طه حسين
    14 days ago

    The legs of the vehicle are very short

    1. yuoop noke
      yuoop noke
      13 days ago

      That thumbnail looks like a rocket a ten-year-old built for the first time

  8. John Adams
    John Adams
    14 days ago

    Doubt takeoff will break windows with superheavy. However, if superheavy and starsho[ blows up after fueling it will destory the windows. We have proof from the Russians/USSR that windows will break up to 6 miles away from a large rocketing rudding. Only woth full load, if it ruds during landing of either two there isnt enough fuel to break them.

    1. aola wili
      aola wili
      13 days ago

      That thumbnail looks like a rocket a ten-year-old built for the first time

  9. mikea hiooi
    mikea hiooi
    14 days ago

    3:39:30 for everyone ....

    1. doire aintu
      doire aintu
      11 days ago

      Dagummit y'all are on trending!!

  10. James Hewitt
    James Hewitt
    15 days ago

    i didn't waste a second of my day.

  11. GonzoVevo
    GonzoVevo
    16 days ago

    Why is there always that one bird?

  12. Naufal Azka
    Naufal Azka
    16 days ago

    3:20:52

  13. Tok
    Tok
    16 days ago

    Никуда они не летают))))

    1. mikea hiooi
      mikea hiooi
      14 days ago

      and nobody's talking about the secret kekw in the link...

  14. Vincent Nacon
    Vincent Nacon
    16 days ago

    4 hours of.... nothing. Good thing I wasn't up to watch this live. XD

  15. Randall Stephens
    Randall Stephens
    16 days ago

    50 to 100 tons of fuel that don’t sound like the new green deal to me but hey I could be wrong I haven’t read it ?

  16. Randall Stephens
    Randall Stephens
    16 days ago

    I wonder what the total cost after it’s all said and done whether it goes up or it goes down or whatever it’s going is it really worth the cost I don’t know our taxes paid for most of it would be my guess correct me if I’m wrong and do you think it’s worth the cost waiting for your post be nice I have been.

  17. Christopher Harrison
    Christopher Harrison
    16 days ago

    SCRUBAKINGSODA

  18. T-Virus Terrance
    T-Virus Terrance
    16 days ago

    Hello, Humans. Do you eat food that’s past its expiration date if it still smells and looks fine? TERRANCE OUT

  19. SoleSoul
    SoleSoul
    16 days ago

    SpaceX so active I forgot anything else existed

  20. Truth Holder
    Truth Holder
    16 days ago

    I could do without the toxic poop commercials. What a farce. Yes, poop is a fact of life. But, this SpaceX stuff is cool.

  21. Waker of Winds
    Waker of Winds
    16 days ago

    Dagummit y'all are on trending!!

  22. Funny Fack
    Funny Fack
    16 days ago

    That thumbnail looks like a rocket a ten-year-old built for the first time

  23. Kscott McCauslin
    Kscott McCauslin
    16 days ago

    the most expensive fireworks in the world right here.

  24. Hans
    Hans
    17 days ago

    Wow rank 26 on trending! Congrats NSF Team!

  25. Jeff Barron
    Jeff Barron
    17 days ago

    Those ship look like something out of a 1950 sci fic movie

    1. Ted Schreier
      Ted Schreier
      15 days ago

      AAAAND??

  26. saschaurmel
    saschaurmel
    17 days ago

    and nobody's talking about the secret kekw in the link...

  27. Martin Stensvehagen
    Martin Stensvehagen
    17 days ago

    Does this community have a discord?

  28. Gar Gantuan
    Gar Gantuan
    17 days ago

    WHO YOU CALLIN SCRUB!?

  29. Terry Jackson
    Terry Jackson
    17 days ago

    2:04:36 the moment you came for

  30. PixelStacker
    PixelStacker
    17 days ago

    With the snappy nature of those static fires, I believe this will be the one to land. 100%!

    1. liams trash content
      liams trash content
      16 days ago

      @haze yes and I did see the full footage

    2. Haze
      Haze
      16 days ago

      @liams trash content do you dare to ride the sn 10 then?, if it still exist.

    3. Haze
      Haze
      16 days ago

      @liams trash content didn't you watch the full footage?

    4. Haze
      Haze
      16 days ago

      @liams trash content it "was".

    5. liams trash content
      liams trash content
      16 days ago

      Sn10 landed

  31. D k
    D k
    17 days ago

    click bait, i thought they finally build a actual starship like you see in halo or any other movie or games....

  32. saimul Haque
    saimul Haque
    17 days ago

    🌮

  33. Satguy 141
    Satguy 141
    17 days ago

    Well you can forget about any flight on Saturday thunderstorm, flash flood warnings.

  34. Adrian Smith
    Adrian Smith
    17 days ago

    I still believe that the craft should re-enter and then controlled flight,no different to the shuttle,and then energy at lower speed to perform the VLO characteristic for landing.dead dropping a weight then trying to reduce speed is hard.the sugar gliders,Australian animal,uses a principal to glide,an air break is used when you fly,so I just wish Elon would just give it a go.also,the position of weight....an arrow drops with the "warhead" leading the shaft through flight,so why wouldn't the same principal apply to the craft trying to land in a vertical position?

    1. Steve Acho
      Steve Acho
      16 days ago

      I've wondered that myself.

  35. CichyYT
    CichyYT
    17 days ago

    You knew the scrub sn15 nice pr

  36. ryszard kieliszewski
    ryszard kieliszewski
    17 days ago

    Mam nadzieję że nie będzie więcej dziwnych płomieni przy lądowaniu. Dla mnie po obejrzeniu 11tki to był czysty SABOTAŻ!!!

  37. Weird Science 911
    Weird Science 911
    17 days ago

    Because it was going to explode, for sure.

  38. magnetmannenbannanen
    magnetmannenbannanen
    17 days ago

    i had a feeling it was not going to land and it did not.

    1. Steve Acho
      Steve Acho
      16 days ago

      It didn't blow up, either.

  39. Marcel Gerber
    Marcel Gerber
    17 days ago

    Elon, are we EVER going to Mars, Jupiter,Uranus?.........👀😬🤦🏼‍♂️😎😆😉🔥🍺

  40. robbie ranson
    robbie ranson
    17 days ago

    1 eternity later

  41. Julio Baigorria
    Julio Baigorria
    17 days ago

    Lunch the day savaday?

  42. PhuketBungalow Info
    PhuketBungalow Info
    17 days ago

    03:41:20 Did they manage to post the times in UTC or just in USAmerican time and we can choose if Eastern, Westcoast or MidUS TimeZone? :/ But hey, since the USA is the WORLD i guess its just the local Boca Chica time and we can count ourselfs :D :D

  43. Devhuti Matte
    Devhuti Matte
    17 days ago

    I got many theories now Eg more than everything Universe theory Black hole

    1. Devhuti Matte
      Devhuti Matte
      17 days ago

      Well didn’t wanna hurt any other teachers feeling But brother Elon and I can have a mutual understanding rn without actually talking

    2. Devhuti Matte
      Devhuti Matte
      17 days ago

      Got things wanna know if we are right

  44. Александр Боклан
    Александр Боклан
    17 days ago

    П Е Д И К И!

  45. Mike Kearney
    Mike Kearney
    17 days ago

    Scrub the whole program.

    1. Mike Kearney
      Mike Kearney
      14 days ago

      @Lensflare Deviant Why can’t you disagree civilly? I’ve made no attacks on you. All your vitriol does is stop an exchange of ideas.

    2. Lensflare Deviant
      Lensflare Deviant
      14 days ago

      @Mike Kearney You don't need to go faster than light to reach another planet, just to go to other solar systems. You're making a fool of yourself. The sad part is I suspect you don't have the capacity to understand.. or much of anything.

    3. Mike Kearney
      Mike Kearney
      14 days ago

      @Lensflare Deviant Sure there are. The fact that it’s impossible to travel faster than light is a physics proof.

    4. Lensflare Deviant
      Lensflare Deviant
      14 days ago

      @Mike Kearney Because it stems from the belief that it's an easy problem to solve and that the small amount of money being spent on this will somehow make the difference with the billions being poured into welfare now. There are no laws of physics that prohibit long space travel. All you've done is prove I was 100% right. You have a very simple understanding of how the world works.

    5. Mike Kearney
      Mike Kearney
      17 days ago

      @Lensflare Deviant Simply take care of the people of this planed instead of firing toys at a rock 90 million miles away. How’s that nonsensical? They call it science FICTION for a reason. You must know that the laws of physics prohibit any long space travel. Even sending astronauts to the nearest planet would be a death sentence.

  46. Vincent Nguyen
    Vincent Nguyen
    17 days ago

    Still foggy... It 's jinxed already...

  47. Dinger Ling
    Dinger Ling
    17 days ago

    Rapid reusable. Point to point earth travel faster than traditional airplanes. If anyone is interested I have a secret robe that makes you invisible and allows you to fly, I will sell it for a mere 250k (the price of a house!!).

  48. Andrew Williams
    Andrew Williams
    17 days ago

    Explosion got scrubbed!

  49. teehbobbbbyyy
    teehbobbbbyyy
    17 days ago

    Oh well

  50. Михаил Набожный
    Михаил Набожный
    17 days ago

    Is it can of beer landing?

  51. Cristiane Peres Ribeiro Salvador
    Cristiane Peres Ribeiro Salvador
    17 days ago

    :(

  52. RobertA105
    RobertA105
    17 days ago

    carbon capture prize? Yeah, this is an old trick practiced by firms who have no idea how to achieve something. They pretend to have a contest with a prize for the community to contribute ideas. Except that the firms keep all the good ideas that have merit for themselves, taking ownership away from the people who came up with the idea, for a poultry prize. That assumes someone actually comes up with a brilliant idea, which they never do. Elon did the same with the hyperloop where he conned University students to try to come up with an idea to make the ridiculous proposal of hyperloop more practical. Which they didn't. There's a serious amount of gullibility going around these days.

    1. Lensflare Deviant
      Lensflare Deviant
      17 days ago

      Really? Which other firms have done this? How is asking students for idea's conning them?

  53. Daniel Ramsey
    Daniel Ramsey
    17 days ago

    Need a perfect clear day for this event.

    1. Anna L. Vajda
      Anna L. Vajda
      16 days ago

      Yeah well people expect there never to be a problem which is unrealistic. It's rocket science for Gods sake.

    2. Jake Rosendahl
      Jake Rosendahl
      17 days ago

      @Dinger Ling Why does it have to be an issue that caused a scrub? It's most likely just weather, we haven't had a single issue in preliminary testing yet and that's new

    3. John Eagle
      John Eagle
      17 days ago

      @Dinger Ling why is it looking grim? These are prototypes. Did you want a finished product day one?

    4. Dinger Ling
      Dinger Ling
      17 days ago

      I thought the point was rapid reusability? Looking grim.

    5. John Eagle
      John Eagle
      17 days ago

      That was my thoughts. Pretty much a brand new series with all of the supposed improvements and upgrades.

  54. Phillip Mulligan
    Phillip Mulligan
    17 days ago

    Better scrubbed than a needless sacrifice. The aerospace engineering gods are only appeased when you learn something from your mistakes and you don't repeat them.

  55. Paul Smith
    Paul Smith
    17 days ago

    gosh, make the aerodynamics of the wing same quality as the nosecone! It gives vibrations and inaccurate landing for sure on low speeds

  56. Fernando
    Fernando
    17 days ago

    Why!? Why the Rocket isn't in burn?

  57. Joey Bando
    Joey Bando
    17 days ago

    every time FFA says go , it’s cloudy .. can’t trust them -_-

  58. Coaching For Today
    Coaching For Today
    17 days ago

    Let's see if Elon can put his big boy pants on and refrain from tweeting about crypto this weekend while he waits to see his latest rocket blow up. You never know whether Thomas Edison or P.T. Barnum is going to show up.

    1. Lensflare Deviant
      Lensflare Deviant
      17 days ago

      Now now zero. We know you hate your betters, but try and not be blatantly stupid about it.

  59. David Roberts
    David Roberts
    17 days ago

    Hi guys shame that Happening if the i near boccheca let’s hope not David ❤️🇬🇧👍🚀

  60. kotaro kojima
    kotaro kojima
    17 days ago

    thats good wait for good sunny day

  61. hsbvt
    hsbvt
    17 days ago

    Update on when the next attempt will be? Just got out of work and missed the scrub announcement.

    1. kworkshop
      kworkshop
      14 days ago

      Tomorrow. It's happening :D

    2. John Woodley
      John Woodley
      17 days ago

      Possibly monday

  62. 24VBMWPower
    24VBMWPower
    17 days ago

    #Wenscrub

  63. wengsky TV
    wengsky TV
    17 days ago

    The high altitude time

  64. J024
    J024
    17 days ago

    I knew it.

    1. Lensflare Deviant
      Lensflare Deviant
      17 days ago

      I suspected. The forecast yesterday was not encouraging.

  65. Starbuck Avon
    Starbuck Avon
    17 days ago

    So what happened this time?

    1. Starbuck Avon
      Starbuck Avon
      17 days ago

      @Lensflare Deviant thank you!

    2. Lensflare Deviant
      Lensflare Deviant
      17 days ago

      Weather.

  66. Seth Jansson
    Seth Jansson
    17 days ago

    With the snappy nature of those static fires, I believe this will be the one to land.

    1. Andrew Flower
      Andrew Flower
      17 days ago

      @Seth Jansson just depends if it's one or many pieces ;)

    2. John Eagle
      John Eagle
      17 days ago

      I hope so with all of the improvements supposedly done. I just don't want to see any unnecessary fire in the engine bay. Every time that has happened we get a failure. Coincidence? Maybe but I don't think anything but thrust should be there.

    3. Seth Jansson
      Seth Jansson
      17 days ago

      @Duder McDudeface But they do recover it, one way or another.

    4. Duder McDudeface
      Duder McDudeface
      17 days ago

      @Seth Jansson Let's say "recovered" is the goal.

    5. Seth Jansson
      Seth Jansson
      17 days ago

      @Duder McDudeface There's a fine line between landing and crash landing.

  67. davetileguy
    davetileguy
    17 days ago

    Elon will succeed, be patient !!

  68. Mike Herman
    Mike Herman
    17 days ago

    I predicted a launch NET May when it rolled to the pad. Raptors are too new to expect timely launches.

    1. Lensflare Deviant
      Lensflare Deviant
      14 days ago

      @Mike Herman True, but to blame all the delays on the Raptors is simplistic.

    2. Jake Rosendahl
      Jake Rosendahl
      17 days ago

      @Mike Herman It's not had any equipment issues though. Any delays were just that, delays. Can be from late arrival of equipment, prioritizing other things, and approval to fly

    3. Mike Herman
      Mike Herman
      17 days ago

      @Lensflare Deviant Yes, because earlier launch weather windows were missed for non-weather issues.

    4. Lensflare Deviant
      Lensflare Deviant
      17 days ago

      Except the issue was weather.

  69. carlos lozano
    carlos lozano
    17 days ago

    Why does the starship look so primative..looks like 1950s russian space tech lol

    1. Jake Rosendahl
      Jake Rosendahl
      17 days ago

      @Julián Castro Not likely to be painted. It's looking like thermal blankets around the whole thing and heat tiles on the "bottom".

    2. Julián Castro
      Julián Castro
      17 days ago

      @mathias veratoro are they planning on painting them? they look just fine like that imo

    3. Lensflare Deviant
      Lensflare Deviant
      17 days ago

      Because they are use once test articles and they expect failures. The idea is to get it working, then refine.

    4. mathias veratoro
      mathias veratoro
      17 days ago

      prototypes so far are not painted or fully heat tiled.

  70. Road Cone
    Road Cone
    17 days ago

    Crap.

  71. DigikidForever
    DigikidForever
    17 days ago

    Meh no worries. It will crash again another day. Rockets suck. Spaceplanes are the real future.

    1. Jake Rosendahl
      Jake Rosendahl
      17 days ago

      Space Planes can have use in limited cases. Low payload, low altitude. They're not capable of being a workhorse for payloads and definitely not heavy lift, not even Electron capability. They're cool, but they're not replacing all of space flight anytime soon

    2. Arcturus
      Arcturus
      17 days ago

      We had 30 years of spaceplanes, look at the progress we've made. 14 dead astronauts, no moon base, and we are stuck in low earth orbit.

    3. Arcturus
      Arcturus
      17 days ago

      You spit on the 14 disintegrated corpses of Challenger and Colombia by saying spaceplanes are actually feasible to use to get anywhere.

    4. DR
      DR
      17 days ago

      If you actually think that spaceplanes are the way to go you should probably not get a rocket engineer.

    5. Hemiacetal
      Hemiacetal
      17 days ago

      @Lensflare Deviant I think a space plane could be used to reach a space station in the Earth's orbit that will have a Starship docked to it.

  72. Fernando
    Fernando
    17 days ago

    Aquí gastando mis datos en la espera 🤫

    1. ASTRONOMO KAWAI
      ASTRONOMO KAWAI
      17 days ago

      Jajajaja yo pensé que había explotado

    2. Fernando
      Fernando
      17 days ago

      @Gabriel R 0.0? Qué pasó, por qué nos dejan sin vuelo?

    3. Gabriel R
      Gabriel R
      17 days ago

      Y te quedaste con las ganas de verlo volar

  73. Pushkaraj Dongre
    Pushkaraj Dongre
    17 days ago

    Are we there yet?

    1. Abso 45 fly
      Abso 45 fly
      17 days ago

      bruh wdym

  74. James Packer
    James Packer
    17 days ago

    NOOOOO!!!!! I was SOOO looking forward to another pretty fireball. Musk has got that part down pat!

  75. adrian howard
    adrian howard
    17 days ago

    Well 💩

  76. Grimbles
    Grimbles
    17 days ago

    All Starships come with a mandatory scrub. Standard procedure don't worry.

  77. Sailing Taranto
    Sailing Taranto
    17 days ago

    I'll be seeking out the Flip n Burn burger bar when I'm ever in town :-)

  78. Darth Onian
    Darth Onian
    17 days ago

    Is there any post processing technique that could be used for SN11 to look through the fog ?

    1. Max Klein
      Max Klein
      17 days ago

      @DanR I was going to link that, very interesting read!

    2. Karl Tiedt
      Karl Tiedt
      17 days ago

      ​@James Packer by all means, link us to the thermal camera live stream... The question was clearly about the live stream everyone watched that was *not* thermal though, so the only numbnuts here appears to be the one not understanding the question.

    3. DanR
      DanR
      17 days ago

      @James Packer It's complicated about the _type_ of fog. For some types, it's no better than visible light. f l i r (d o t) c a / discover / rd-science / can-thermal-imaging-see-through-fog-and-rain

    4. James Packer
      James Packer
      17 days ago

      It's called a thermal camera numbnuts

    5. Karl Tiedt
      Karl Tiedt
      17 days ago

      Recorded video only includes visible data so if it's not visible not much you can do about it. Not like you can switch to thermal views after the fact like some TV shows love to do 😉

  79. wengsky TV
    wengsky TV
    17 days ago

    What is the time of flight

  80. Open World Gaming's 2nd Account
    Open World Gaming's 2nd Account
    17 days ago

    Scrubadubadub

  81. Jowey de la Nota
    Jowey de la Nota
    17 days ago

    The amount of issues they have launching these ships is going to kill their marketable plans. The ship make take you from point A to point B in 30 minutes but having to wait 3-6-12-24-48 hrs kills the point.

    1. Carl Johan
      Carl Johan
      16 days ago

      @Jake Rosendahl Not sure if you replied to the correct person my dude, as you pretty much made my argument here.

    2. Jake Rosendahl
      Jake Rosendahl
      17 days ago

      @Carl Johan Did the falcon have great reusability at first? The success rate was bad for a while, then turnaround times were slow, recovery weather was sensitive with an abundance of caution. They've fixed all that over time, it ain't gonna be absolutely perfect on a prototype no less, this is completely not a fair assessment when it's a TEST and they don't know it's weather capabilities yet or have full reliability and they aren't going to push that until they have the basics down. Imo it's hard to say that starship is "very much intended" for point to point passenger. Like I said, it was an extremely early concept that doesn't actually make any sense. Nobody will pay for it because it's expensive in propellant alone and the launch constraints make it impractical.

    3. Carl Johan
      Carl Johan
      17 days ago

      @Jowey de la Nota Literally everyone says "it's impossible" and they do it anyway. How many times does this pattern need to repeat before people stop saying the same thing? And the current (incomplete) version of starship is OBVIOUSLY not reliable enough for human travel, because it's incomplete. The first airplane to ever fly wasn't suited for daily flights across half the world either, and now we got thousands of planes carrying hundreds of people every single day. And there was a time when human flight was impossible. If something is physically possible to do, it's doable with enough effort. Star lifting is physically possible and achievable in a far future despite being impossible for us to do right now. You are focusing on walls while everyone at SpaceX are focusing on finding ways to climb over the walls, hence why they keep achieving things that everyone else constantly says they can't achieve. This is why saying "it will never work" is downright naive at this point. And what the actual fuck kind of logic is "listing what Space X has been able to accomplish so far is not a scientifical fact"? Yes, it is a fact, because they've done it and it works.

    4. Carl Johan
      Carl Johan
      17 days ago

      @Jake Rosendahl It's not being focused on right now, but it very much is one of the intended goals.

    5. Jake Rosendahl
      Jake Rosendahl
      17 days ago

      @Jowey de la Nota "plans" as in marketing materials from years ago never mentioned again or even recently. Seems pretty dropped to me. It was probably thought as a funding method before starlink, and they probably gave it some thought and realized the design does not support this use practically. Costs way too much, has to launch far away from populations, not much demand for that fast of travel, etc

  82. Interstellar
    Interstellar
    17 days ago

    damn it

  83. Sanjay Ravindran
    Sanjay Ravindran
    17 days ago

    nooooooooooooo

  84. loctite222ms
    loctite222ms
    17 days ago

    No explosion today then .

  85. Adam
    Adam
    17 days ago

    I was looking forward to watching this when I woke up now I have to wait again

  86. Rachhanon Sam
    Rachhanon Sam
    17 days ago

    welp i guess its tomorrow

    1. Chace Crowell
      Chace Crowell
      16 days ago

      @Kaizen I would think that they're gonna do everything they can to launch Monday since Elon has to be in NYC for SNL rehearsals Tues-Sat

    2. Kaizen
      Kaizen
      17 days ago

      It's Monday now

    3. Chace Crowell
      Chace Crowell
      17 days ago

      They don't like weekends because of beach access

  87. Rachhanon Sam
    Rachhanon Sam
    17 days ago

    WHY ELON... WHY

    1. Atiyeh Stark
      Atiyeh Stark
      16 days ago

      Do one tenth of what he did then talk

    2. Sfs Jakey
      Sfs Jakey
      17 days ago

      Poor weather, possible lighting probably more better to scrub then explode mid flight

  88. Max Klein
    Max Klein
    17 days ago

    Scrub news at 3:39:30

    1. Luke Parsons
      Luke Parsons
      17 days ago

      No all heroes wear capes

  89. Joshua Diamond
    Joshua Diamond
    17 days ago

    Apparently there is a power outage on South Padre Island. That might be reason for the scrub.

    1. Lensflare Deviant
      Lensflare Deviant
      14 days ago

      @Morten Vajhøj Indeed. What is the capacity vs the demand?

    2. Lelentos
      Lelentos
      17 days ago

      Starship hops over there to provide power from the onboard tesla powerpacks

    3. Morten Vajhøj
      Morten Vajhøj
      17 days ago

      @Lensflare Deviant yeah they do but its not enough

    4. Lensflare Deviant
      Lensflare Deviant
      17 days ago

      I thought they had their own solar farm.

  90. fxnimatedits
    fxnimatedits
    17 days ago

    3:39:30 for everyone ....

  91. Crooked Angle
    Crooked Angle
    17 days ago

    Well isn’t this just great...

  92. fxnimatedits
    fxnimatedits
    17 days ago

    Why didnt it launch??

    1. Dinger Ling
      Dinger Ling
      16 days ago

      @anthony ferrante a prototype doesn't change the weather. When you are traveling hours out by boat to willingly fly on a giant bomb only for it to be delayed by a week.

    2. anthony ferrante
      anthony ferrante
      17 days ago

      @Dinger Ling its a prototype lad

    3. Dinger Ling
      Dinger Ling
      17 days ago

      Because the rocket they plan on reusing over and over to travel point to point on earth and land on the dusty planet of Mars in just 3 years isn't very safe or reliable.

    4. adrian howard
      adrian howard
      17 days ago

      It fouled a spark plug

    5. anthony ferrante
      anthony ferrante
      17 days ago

      weather

  93. B N
    B N
    17 days ago

    3:39:30 it was at this moment we know.....

    1. Lyri Metacurl
      Lyri Metacurl
      17 days ago

      ... that they had fooked up?

    2. AG Solar Power
      AG Solar Power
      17 days ago

      Thanks

    3. Dean
      Dean
      17 days ago

      Thanks ! the hero we need

    4. Chance Barker
      Chance Barker
      17 days ago

      Thanks!!!!

    5. Don Quixote
      Don Quixote
      17 days ago

      Thanks for that.

  94. fxnimatedits
    fxnimatedits
    17 days ago

    Better luck Next Time !

  95. TimePro
    TimePro
    17 days ago

    What a bummer. I even did my math's test first thing just so I can watch the launch. Lets hope for Monday!

    1. Tony Wadkins
      Tony Wadkins
      9 days ago

      ​@Bodhi Nathan Could I suggest that you depart in an auto-reproductive manner?

    2. Tony Wadkins
      Tony Wadkins
      16 days ago

      @davetileguy It's what Americans call maths, mathematics.

    3. Three Random Words
      Three Random Words
      17 days ago

      New Math says 2+2=5 🤡 👎🏻

    4. John Eagle
      John Eagle
      17 days ago

      @davetileguy silence you space denying flat earther. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣👍

    5. TimePro
      TimePro
      17 days ago

      @Crasy Fingers Indeed they do. Its part of the deal when SpaceX was first making their presence in Boca Chica for them not to do road closures on weekends.

  96. Liam Robins
    Liam Robins
    17 days ago

    Averaging 3-4 uploads a day over the past 7 days, Keep the videos and streams coming

  97. RYAN STOW
    RYAN STOW
    17 days ago

    First just refreshed the page after the stream stopped

  98. Yusuf
    Yusuf
    17 days ago

    Why wasn't it launched

    1. Ezra Starkey
      Ezra Starkey
      16 days ago

      The road closure was cancelled due to poor weather.

    2. TimePro
      TimePro
      17 days ago

      The road closure was suddenly pulled.

    3. Sodium Chloride
      Sodium Chloride
      17 days ago

      Weather probably

    4. Liam Robins
      Liam Robins
      17 days ago

      It broke

  99. TheDrunkUncle
    TheDrunkUncle
    17 days ago

    womp womp.

  100. Jack Whitlock
    Jack Whitlock
    17 days ago

    Godspeed SN15